Escolle & Wife v. Merle
ESCOLLE AND WIFE v. MERLE
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Lawrence F. Terry, Albert G. Burnett
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Terryburnett
Terry, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court—Burnett, J., concurring.
The appeal in this case is taken on questions of fact alone.
We are of opinion that the evidence introduced by the plaintiff was sufficient, if uncontradicted, to support the verdict; and we have uniformly held that we will not interfere with the verdict of a jury, when there is any evidence to support it.
The affidavit, and counter-affidavit, filed on motion for new trial, raised a question of fact as to whether the letters mentioned contained the admissions alleged by defendant and denied by plaintiff. This question was decided by the Judge below, and, we must presume, decided correctly.
Judgment affirmed, with twenty per cent, damages, and costs.
Cited by
- Williams v. Reed Civ. No. 2923. · 1919-10-03
- Frink v. Roe No. 8879 · 1886-07-30