Caney v. Silverthorne
CANEY v. SILVERTHORNE
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Lawrence F. Terry, Albert G. Burnett
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Burnettterry
Burnett, J., delivered the opinion of the Court—TERRy, C. J., concurring.
The defendant, having failed to give notice of his intention to move for a new trial, or to file his statement within the time *68limited by the statute, lost his right to move for a new trial. (Practice Act, § 195.)
There is no statement on appeal; the statement for new trial not having been filed in time, is not properly a part of the record. We can only look at the judgment-roll; which, being regular on its face, judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Cited by
- Kerns v. Dean No. 8041 · 1885-04-28
- Campbell v. Jones No. 2,581 · 1871-07-01