Shaw v. McGregor
SHAW v. McGREGOR
- Proceeding
- appeal
- Outcome
- reversed — The order of the Court below is reversed, with costs.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Lawrence F. Terry, Albert G. Burnett
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Terryburnett
Terry, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court—Burnett, J., concurring.
Appeal from an order setting aside judgment. We have heretofore decided that, “ after the adjournment of the term, the Court loses all control- over its judgments, unless its jurisdiction is saved by some motion or proceeding at the time, except when the summons has not been served', in which case a party may, within six months, move to set aside the judgment.”
In other eases, a Court has no power to vacate a judgment, on a motion made after the adjournment of the term at which the judgment was rendered. Carpentier v. Hart, 5 Cal., 406; Suydam v. Pilcher, 4 Cal., 280; Robb v. Robb, Jan. Term, 1857.
The order of the Court below is reversed, with costs.
Cites, in this corpus
- Carpentier v. Hart · 1855-07-01
- Suydam v. Pitcher · 1854-07-15
Cited by
- People v. Karaman S022502 · 1992-12-21
- People v. McAllister Crim. 4266 · 1940-05-27
- Osmont v. All Persons, Etc. S.F. No. 5967. · 1913-06-12
- Brackett v. Banegas No. 19123 · 1893-10-07
- Norton v. Atchison, Topeka, & Santa Fé Railroad No. 14614 · 1893-02-25
- Casement v. Ringgold · 1865-07-15
- Castro v. Richardson · 1864-07-01