Feeny v. Daly
FEENY v. DALY
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Lawrence F. Terry, Albert G. Burnett
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Terryburnett
Terry, J., delivered the opinion of the Court—Burnett, J., concurring.
The debt of an insolvent bankrupt is due in conscience, not-, withstanding his discharge, and is a sufficient consideration to \ support a subsequent express promise to pay.
A verbal promise is sufficient at common law, and there is nothing in our statutes which changes the rule.
Judgment affirmed.
Cited by
- Wilson v. Wilson Sac. 7018 · 1960-05-27
- Bank of Italy v. Welbilt Auto Body Co. Docket No. 5669. · 1929-10-28