Kraemer v. Revalk
KRAEMER v. REVALK
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- William J. Murray, Jr., Albert G. Burnett
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Burnettmurray
Burnett, J., delivered the opinion of the Court—Murray, C. J., concurring.
The question necessary to dispose of this case, was decided in the case of John Bevalk and others v. Kraemer and others, July 1857. The judgment in this case did not affect either Bevalk or his wife, so far as the question of homestead was concerned, and he, alone, had no right to appeal. Unless both husband and wife were before the Court, no notice should have been taken as to the question of homestead.
For this reason, the appeal must be dismissed.