Benedict v. Bunnell
BENEDICT v. BUNNELL
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Albert G. Burnett (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Burnett
Burnett, J., delivered the opinion of the Court—Murray, C. J., concurring.
The defendant executed a note and mortgage to plaintiff. At the date of the note and mortgage, the defendant was a married man, but his wife was not then a resident of this State.
The only question in this case was settled in the case of Cary v. Tice and wife, decided at the last term of this Court. “ The premises never were impressed with the character of a homestead until actual residence upon them hy the family/-’
So much of the judgment of the Court below as is appealed from is reversed, and that Court will enter judgment in accordance with this opinion.
Cited by
- Werner v. Superior Court of S.F. S.F. No. 5798. · 1911-10-17
- Tipton v. Martin No. 11109 · 1886-11-29
- Babcock v. GIBBS No. 5669 · 1878-07-01
- Gambette v. Brock No. 2,574 · 1871-07-01