Hudson v. Doyle
HUDSON v. DOYLE
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Heydefeldt (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Heydefeldt
The opinion opinion of the Court was delivered by by Mr. Justice Heydefeldt.
Mr. Justice Terry concurred. • The object of the action was to abate a nuisance. The prayer for damages was only incident to the objects If the plaintiff had recovered no damages, he would be entitled to his costs. His recovery, therefore, of damages less than two hundred dollars, cannot operate to deprive him of this right.
Judgment affirmed.
Cited by
- White v. White S.F. No. 1380. · 1900-12-06
- Willis v. Farley · 1864-07-01