Harper v. Freelon
HARPER v. FREELON
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Solomon Heydenfeldt (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Heydenfeldt
Mr. Justice Heydenfeldt delivered the opinion of the Court.
Mr. Justice Terry concurred.
Cases in insolvency under the Insolvent Debtor’s Act of 1852, are special cases within the meaning of the Constitution, and the jurisdiction of which the Legislature has the right to dispose of and vest in any of the Courts of this State of original civil jurisdiction.
In the exercise of a legitimate power, the Legislature has given jurisdiction in these cases to both the District and County Courts, and these Courts hold it concurrently. There is no reason therefore for the refusal of the County Judge to proceed upon the petition of the apellant, and the mandamus must he made peremptory. So ordered.
Cited by
- McNiel v. Borland · 1863-07-01