Coffinberry v. Horrill
CHARLES S. COFFINBERRY and JOHN H. SEAWELL v. JOHNSON HORRILL and SARAH N. HORRILL
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Solomon Heydenfeldt (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Heydenfeldt
Heydenfeldt, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.
Murray, C. J., concurred.
The error relied upon is the rendition and entry of judgment at a time when there was no legal term of the District Court. This assignment is sustained by the record; so upon the authority of Smith v. Chichester, 1 Cal., 409, the judgment is reversed and the cause remanded.
Cites, in this corpus
- Smith v. Chichester · 1851-04-15