Barnstead v. Empire Mining Co.
THOMAS S. BARNSTEAD v. THE EMPIRE MINING COMPANY
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- William J. Murray, Jr. (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Murray
Murray, C. J., delivered the opinion of the Court, Bryan, J., and Heydenfeldt, J., concurred.
There is no ground in this case which seriously warrants an appeal. The right of a member of an incorporated company to sue the incorporation has never, to our knowledge, been doubted, and, in this very right consists one of the essential differences, between incorporations and mere partnerships; for in the latter, one partner cannot sue in an action at law, but must file his bill in equity for a dissolution and an account.
There was no error in excluding the defendants’ evidence; they were *300directly interested in the result of the judgment, and incompetent under the statute.
Much stress was laid in argument upon the order of the Court, directing the defendants to produce books and papers. The order was correct, and made upon the authority of the statute. The other objections are frivolous.
Judgment affirmed with costs.
Cited by
- Freeman v. Donohoe Civ. No. 2589. · 1923-12-26