Coyle v. Baldwin
JOHN COYLE, and others v. ALEX. BALDWIN, and others
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Solomon Heydenfeldt (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Heydenfeldt
Heydenfeldt, J., delivered the opinion of the Court.
Murray, C. J., concurred.
The County Court reversed the judgment of the Justice of the Peace, on motion—upon the ground that it did not appear that the defendants had notice of the trial.
This was erroneous ; the parties were in the County Court on appeal, for the purpose of trying the case de novo, and it was the duty of the Court to proceed with the trial on the merits of the case.
The judgment of dismissal is reversed, and the cause remanded for trial in the County Court.
Cited by
- Acker v. Superior Court No. 11188 · 1885-12-23