Swift v. Arents
ELIJAH SWIFT v. HIRAM ARENTS
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Heydeneeldt (author), William J. Murray, Jr.
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Heydeneeldt
Mr. Justice Heydeneeldt delivered the opinion of the Court.
Mr. Ch. J. Murray concurred.
The demurrer was improperly sustained. The bill is filed by a creditor asking relief against fraudulent transfers and concealment of his property by the debtor. This is a substantial ground of equity jurisdiction, and we see no reason for refusing to entertain it.
Judgment reversed, and the cause remanded.
Cited by
- McCutcheon v. Superior Court Docket No. 9094. · 1933-08-22
- Rapp v. Whittier S. F. No. 99 · 1896-07-23
- Watkins v. Wilhoit No. 18,167 · 1894-01-26