People v. Peralta
THE PEOPLE v. DOMINGO PERALTA
- Area
- criminal
- Panel
- William J. Murray, Jr. (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Murray
Per Murray, Chief Justice, Heydenfeldt, Justice, concurring.
The defendant was convicted of an assault and battery in the Court of Sessions. He appealed to the District Court, where the judgment was affirmed.
We have decided at this term, in Caulfield y. Hudson, that the District Court has no appellate power. It was therefore error to take jurisdiction.
The judgment of affirmance in the District Court is reversed, and the appeal from the Court of Sessions to the District Court is dismissed.
Let the costs abide the final result.
Cited by
- Powers v. City of Richmond S039547 · 1995-05-08
- Pacific Telephone Etc. Co. v. Eshleman S.F. No. 6499. · 1913-12-20