Gregory v. Hay
GREGORY v. HAY
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Solomon Heydenfeldt (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Heydenfeldt
Heydenfeldt, Justice, delivered the opinion of the court. Wells, Justice, concurred.
*334To obtain the injunction in this case, it was necessary for the bill of complaint to aver either the insolvency of the defendant, or that he is without any tangible property which could be made the subject of attachment or execution. Without either of these averments, the bill is too defective to sustain the order for an injunction and receiver.
The order of dissolution is affirmed, and the cause remanded for further proceedings.
Cited by
- Eames v. Philpot Docket No. 2852. · 1925-04-02