Young v. Polack
CHARLES B. YOUNG v. JOEL S. POLACK
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Solomon Heydenfeldt (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Heydenfeldt
Heydenfeldt, Justice, delivered the opinion of the court. Wells, Justice, concurred.
The plaintiff and defendant were joint tenants of an estate for years, and this bill was filed to compel the defendant to contribute for improvements made by plaintiff on the joint property.
The object of the appeal seems to be, to deprive the defendant of his interest in the lease. This of course it is impossible to do. The court below has gone very far, in rendering all the relief to which the plaintiff is entitled, and there is certainly nothing in the decree which can be the subject of complaint on his part.
The judgment is affirmed, with costs.
Cited by
- O'Steen v. Craig Civ. 21555 · 1956-10-23
- Atwood v. Little Bonanza Quicksilver Co. Civ. No. 807. · 1910-06-14
- Drake v. De Witt No. 52. · 1905-09-21