Rabe v. Wells & Co.
RABE v. WELLS & CO.
- Area
- family
- Panel
- Solomon Heydenfeldt (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Heydenfeldt
Heydenfeldt, Justice, delivered the opinion of the court. Wells, Justice, concurred.
*151The question of notice as to the dissolution of the partnership, was properly left to the finding of the jury under the charge of the court.
In the issue presented by the pleadings, it would have been proper to introduce evidence to show that the dissolution was not bona fide, but it does not appear how the evidence which was rejected would have tended to that result.
Error which is relied on must be shown clearly and affirmatively.
Judgment affirmed.
Cited by
- Morgan v. Hugg · 1855-07-01