People v. Navis
THE PEOPLE v. JUAN NAVIS
- Area
- criminal
- Panel
- Solomon Heydenfeldt (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Heydenfeldt
Heydenfeldt, Justice, delivered the opinion of the court. Wells, Justice, concurred.
Where the admission or confession of a party is resorted to as evidence, it is error to exclude any portion of it made at the same time as the part which is related.
For this reason, the judgment is reversed, and a new trial ordered.
Cited by
- People v. Crowl Crim. 364 · 1938-08-25