Truebody v. Jacobson
JOHN TRUEBODY v. F. M. JACOBSON, A. T. WILSON, and H. SPARKS
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Solomon Heydenfeldt (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion — Heydenfeldt
Justice Heydenfeldt delivered the opinion of the Court. The purchase of the property mentioned in the bill, by the plaintiff from Dunbar, gave him the legal title. His purchase at the sale, made under the decree rendered in the action which is referred to in the bill, invested him with the equity. So that, as appears from his own averments, he has a complete investiture of the legal and equitable title, as fully as it could be derived from Dunbar, the first owner.
This bill is filed to set aside his own decree, the sale made under it, at which he was the purchaser, and to obtain another and fresh sale. For what good reason all this is desired, is beyond an ordinary comprehension.
Judgment below affirmed.
February 19. Re-hearing granted.