gno.law

McDougal v. Roman

California Supreme Court · · 1852-01-15 · Published · 2 Cal. 80

JOHN McDOUGAL v. RICHARD ROMAN

Area
civil

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The law of January 26th, 1852, did not take effect until the 27th, the date on which it received the approval *81of the Governor; and does not, in its operation, affect any money in the hands of the Treasurer before the 27th. Such money must be paid according to the provisions of law. So much of the judgment of the Court below as gives costs against the Treasurer, must be reversed. The judgment for a peremptory mandamus is affirmed, with costs.