Mary Clark v. United States
- Proceeding
- appeal
- Trial court
- United States District Court for the Western District of Washington
- Trial judge
- Robert J. Bryan (district judge)
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
856 F.2d 1433 Mary CLARK, et al., Plaintiffs/Appellees, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant/Appellant.
No. 87-3967.
United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
Argued and Submitted Aug. 3, 1988.
Decided Sept. 14, 1988.
1 William G. Cole, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, D.C., for defendant/appellant.
2 David R. Lord, Ferguson & Burdell, Seattle, Wash., for Ed Nojd et al.
3 G. Lee Raaen and Ann Cross Eschenbach, Seattle, Wash., for Mary Clark et al.
4 Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington; Robert J. Bryan, District Judge, Presiding.
5 Before ALARCON and BEEZER, Circuit Judges, and NIELSEN,* district judge.
ORDER
6 We affirm the decision of the district court for the reasons stated in the district court's opinion, which is reported in Clark v. U.S., 660 F.Supp. 1164 (W.D.Wash.1987).
* Honorable Leland C. Nielsen, Senior United States District Judge for the Southern District of California, sitting by designation