People v. Jackson CA2/4
- Proceeding
- appeal from an order
- Trial court
- Superior Court of Los Angeles County
- Trial judge
- Suzette Clover
- Outcome
- dismissed — Dismissed.
- Area
- criminal
- Panel
- Brian S. Currey (author), Nora M. Manella, Thomas L. Willhite
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
Filed 6/22/21 P. v. Jackson CA2/4 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(a). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115(a).
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION FOUR
THE PEOPLE, B306544
Plaintiff and Respondent, Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. GA009645 v. JACK JACKSON, JR., Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Suzette Clover, Judge. Dismissed. Adrian K. Panton, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent. In 1992, defendant and appellant Jack Jackson Jr. pled guilty to one count of mayhem (Pen. Code, § 203), and the trial court sentenced him to an upper term of eight years in state prison. In 2020, Jackson filed a petition for resentencing under Penal Code section 1170.95. The trial court denied the petition, concluding Jackson was ineligible for relief because he was not convicted of murder. Jackson timely appealed. Appellate counsel filed a brief identifying no issues and asking us to review the record independently. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436.) The court notified Jackson he had 30 days to file a supplemental brief. Jackson did not file a supplemental brief. This court has no independent duty to review the record for reasonably arguable issues. (People v. Cole (2020) 52 Cal.App.5th 1023, 1039-1040, review granted, Oct. 14, 2020, No. S264278.) We therefore dismiss Jackson’s appeal as abandoned. (Ibid.)
2 DISPOSITION
The appeal is dismissed.
NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS
CURREY, J.
We concur:
MANELLA, P.J.
WILLHITE, J.
Cites, in this corpus
- People v. Wende Crim. 20851 · 1979-10-12