People v. Spencer
- Area
- criminal
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
Filed 9/12/18
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, ) ) Plaintiff and Respondent, ) ) S057242 v. ) ) CHRISTOPHER ALAN SPENCER, ) ) Santa Clara County Defendant and Appellant. ) Super. Ct. No. 155731 ____________________________________ )
ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING THE COURT: The opinion in this matter filed July 12, 2018, and appearing at 5 Cal.5th 642, is modified as follows: On page 677 of the opinion, the first sentence in the paragraph beginning, “With the exception of the photographs, Spencer does not appear to have objected to the introduction of the victim impact evidence” is modified to add “specifically” before “objected,” “particular” before “victim,” and “at issue” to end the sentence. As modified, the sentence will now read:
With the exception of the photographs, Spencer does not appear to have specifically objected to the introduction of the particular victim impact evidence at issue.
1 The footnote appended to this sentence (fn. 5) is unchanged. This modification does not affect the judgment. The petition for rehearing is denied.
Cites, in this corpus
- People v. Spencer S057242 · 2018-07-12