People v. Mora & Rangel
- Area
- criminal
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
Filed 8/22/18
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, ) ) Plaintiff and Respondent, ) ) S079925 v. ) ) JOSEPH ADAM MORA and RUBEN ) RANGEL, ) ) Los Angeles County Defendants and Appellants. ) Super. Ct. No. TA037999 ____________________________________)
ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING PETITIONS FOR REHEARING
THE COURT: The opinion in this matter filed July 2, 2018, and appearing at 5 Cal.5th 442, is modified as follows: 1. The second to last sentence in the second full paragraph on page 489 beginning with the words, “The wallets were,” is modified to read as follows: “Urrutia’s wallet was found in an open and apparent location in the 4Runner.” 2. The second to last sentence in the second full paragraph on page 491 beginning with the words, “Defendants allowed,” is modified to read as follows: “Defendants allowed Urrutia time to remove his wallet and place it in an open area of the 4Runner before finally shooting him, while Encinas’s wallet remained in the vehicle’s center console.” This modification does not affect the judgment. The petitions for rehearing are denied.
Cites, in this corpus
- People v. Mora & Rangel S079925 · 2018-07-02