People v. Lopez
- Area
- criminal
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
Filed 8/15/18
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA
THE PEOPLE, ) ) Plaintiff and Respondent, ) ) S099549 v. ) ) MICHAEL AUGUSTINE LOPEZ, ) ) Alameda County Defendant and Appellant. ) Super. Ct. No. H28492A ____________________________________)
ORDER MODIFYING OPINION AND DENYING PETITION FOR REHEARING
THE COURT: The opinion in this matter filed June 28, 2018, and appearing at 5 Cal.5th 339, is modified as follows: In the first sentence of the second full paragraph on page 353, the following words are deleted: “that a competency ruling under Evidence Code section 701 was not sufficient and.” As modified, the sentence will now read: “We reject Lopez’s argument that the trial court was required to hold a hearing under Evidence Code section 702.” The modification does not affect the judgment. The petition for rehearing is denied.
Cites, in this corpus
- People v. Lopez S099549 · 2018-06-28