Liberty Surplus Ins. Corp. v. Ledesma & Meyer Construction Co.
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
Filed 7/25/18 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA LIBERTY SURPLUS INSURANCE ) CORPORATION et al., ) ) Plaintiffs and Respondents, ) S236765 ) v. ) ) 9th Cir. No. 14-56120 LEDESMA & MEYER ) CONSTRUCTION COMPANY, INC., ) et al., ) ) Defendants and Appellants. ) ____________________________________)
ORDER MODIFYING OPINION THE COURT: The opinion in this matter, which was filed June 4, 2018, appearing at 5 Cal.5th 216, is modified as follows: 1. The final sentence of the third full paragraph on page 220, beginning “The district” is modified to read: The district court granted summary judgment to Liberty on its claim for declaratory relief. 2. The second sentence of the paragraph spanning pages 226 and 227, beginning “There, the insured” is modified to read: There, the insured taxi cab company sought liability insurance coverage for a child molestation committed by one of its drivers at a school. These modifications do not affect the judgment.
Cites, in this corpus
- Liberty Surplus Ins. Corp. v. Ledesma & Meyer Construction Co., Inc. S236765 · 2018-06-04