North County Communications Co v. Sprint Communications Company
- Proceeding
- appeal
- Trial court
- United States District Court for the Southern District of California
- Trial judge
- Cathy Ann Bencivengo (district judge)
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JUN 28 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NORTH COUNTY COMMUNICATIONS No. 17-56438 CORPORATION, a California corporation, D.C. No. Plaintiff-counter- 3:09-cv-02685-CAB-JLB defendant-Appellant, v. MEMORANDUM* SPRINT COMMUNICATIONS COMPANY, L.P., a Delaware limited partnership, Defendant-counter-claimant- Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Cathy Ann Bencivengo, District Judge, Presiding Submitted June 4, 2018** San Francisco, California Before: CLIFTON and FRIEDLAND, Circuit Judges, and RICE,*** Chief District Judge.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Thomas O. Rice, Chief United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Washington, sitting by designation. We AFFIRM for the reasons given by the district court.