James Weismann v. Caliber Home Loans, Inc.
- Proceeding
- appeal
- Trial court
- United States District Court for the Southern District of California
- Trial judge
- Gonzalo P. Curiel (district judge)
- Outcome
- affirmed — AFFIRMED.
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 21 2018 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT JAMES WEISMANN, No. 16-56775 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:16-cv-00203-GPC-BLM v. MEMORANDUM* CALIBER HOME LOANS, INC., a corporation; DOES, 1 to 100, Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Gonzalo P. Curiel, District Judge, Presiding Submitted May 15, 2018** Before: SILVERMAN, BEA, and WATFORD, Circuit Judges.
James Weismann appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his diversity action alleging federal and state law claims arising out of foreclosure proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). affirm.
In his opening brief, Weismann fails to address the district court’s grounds for dismissal and has therefore waived his challenge to the district court’s order.
See Indep. Towers of Wash. v. Washington, 350 F.3d 925, 929 (9th Cir. 2003)
(“[W]e will not consider any claims that were not actually argued in appellant’s opening brief.”); Acosta-Huerta v. Estelle, 7 F.3d 139, 144 (9th Cir. 1993) (issues not supported by argument in pro se appellant’s opening brief are waived).
AFFIRMED.
2 16-56775