United States v. David Rosales-Aguilar
- Proceeding
- appeal
- Trial court
- United States District Court for the Southern District of California
- Outcome
- affirmed — AFFIRMED.
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
FILED NOT FOR PUBLICATION NOV 09 2017 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 14-50315 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:13-cr-03254-BTM-1 v. DAVID ROSALES-AGUILAR, MEMORANDUM* Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Barry Ted Moskowitz, Chief Judge, Presiding Argued and Submitted September 1, 2015 Submission Withdrawn March 21, 2017 Resubmitted November 9, 2017 Pasadena, California Before: KOZINSKI, O’SCANNLAIN and BYBEE, Circuit Judges.
California Health and Safety Code section 11352(a) is divisible. United States v. Martinez-Lopez, 864 F.3d 1034, 1043 (9th Cir. 2017) (en banc). The * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. page 2 district court didn’t err by enhancing Rosales’s sentence. See United States v. Rosales-Aguilar, 818 F.3d 965, 973 (9th Cir. 2016).
AFFIRMED.
Cites, in this corpus
- United States v. David Rosales-Aguilar 14-50315 · 2016-04-12