United States v. Oliver Dolores-Cruz
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Oliver DOLORES-CRUZ, Defendant-Appellant
- Proceeding
- appeal
- Trial court
- United States District Court for the Southern District of California
- Trial judge
- Gonzalo P. Curiel (district judge)
- Outcome
- dismissed — DISMISSED.
- Area
- criminal
- Panel
- Stephen S. Trott (author), Consuelo M. Callahan, Atsushi W. Tashima
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS JAN 24 2017 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 15-50354 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 3:15-cr-00127-GPC v. MEMORANDUM* OLIVER DOLORES-CRUZ, Defendant-Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California Gonzalo P. Curiel, District Judge, Presiding Submitted January 18, 2017** Before: TROTT, TASHIMA, and CALLAHAN, Circuit Judges.
Oliver Dolores-Cruz appeals from the district court’s judgment and challenges the 27-month sentence imposed following his guilty-plea conviction for attempted reentry of a removed alien, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326. A review of the record indicates that this appeal is moot because Dolores-Cruz has fully served * This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). his custodial sentence and is not subject to a term of supervised release. See Spencer v. Kemna, 523 U.S. 1, 14 (1998); United States v. Palomba, 182 F.3d 1121, 1123 (9th Cir. 1999).
DISMISSED.
2 15-50354