People v. Silver CA2/1
- Proceeding
- appeal from a judgment
- Trial court
- Superior Court of Los Angeles County · No. BA406335
- Trial judge
- William N. Sterling
- Outcome
- affirmed — Affirmed.
- Area
- criminal
- Panel
- Victoria G. Chaney (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
Filed 7/11/16 P. v. Silver CA2/1 NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION ONE
THE PEOPLE, B265417
Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. BA406335) v.
GILBERT SILVER
Defendant and Appellant.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, William N. Sterling, Judge. Affirmed. Russell S. Babcock, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. No appearance for Plaintiff and Respondent. ______________________ On December 31, 2012, Gilbert Silver was hosting a New Year’s Eve party at his home in Los Angeles when officers of the Los Angeles Police Department arrived, having heard gunshots in the area and determining they came from Silver’s location. One of the officers then witnessed Silver fire a black assault-type rifle into the air. A jury convicted Silver of grossly negligent discharge of a firearm (Pen. Code, § 246.3), and he was sentenced to three years probation conditioned on his serving 180 days in jail, less custody credit of 44 days, and performing 30 days of service work with Caltrans. We appointed counsel to represent Silver on appeal and, after examination of the record, appointed counsel filed an opening brief raising no issues and asking this court to review the record independently. (People v. Wende (1979) 25 Cal.3d 436, 441-442.) On March 22, 2016, we sent letters to Silver and appointed counsel, directing counsel to immediately forward the appellate record to Silver and advising Silver that within 30 days he could personally submit any contentions or issues that he wished us to consider. Silver did not respond. We have examined the entire record and find no arguable issue exists. We are therefore satisfied that Silver’s attorney complied with his responsibilities, and affirm the judgment. (People v. Wende, supra, 25 Cal.3d at p. 441.)
DISPOSITION The judgment is affirmed. NOT TO BE PUBLISHED.
CHANEY, Acting P. J.
We concur:
JOHNSON, J. LUI, J. 2
Cites, in this corpus
- People v. Wende Crim. 20851 · 1979-10-12