gno.law

Munoz v. County of Imperial

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 77-3293 · 1981-01-16 · Published

Guillermo Gallego Munoz Humberto Martinez, Lic. Juan De Leon, Plaintiffs v. County of Imperial Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of Imperial James Harmon Louis Legaspi John Kennerson James Bucher Tunney Williams Herman M. Sperber J. Leonard Speer Donald Courtney McDougal

Area
civil

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

636 F.2d 1189 Guillermo Gallego MUNOZ; Humberto Martinez, Lic. Juan de Leon, Plaintiffs- Appellees, v. COUNTY OF IMPERIAL; Superior Court of the State of California, in and for the County of Imperial; James Harmon;

Louis Legaspi; John Kennerson; James Bucher; Tunney Williams; Herman M. Sperber; J. Leonard Speer; Donald Courtney McDougal, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 77-3293.

United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Jan. 16, 1981.

1 James H. Harmon, County Counsel, El Centro, Cal., for defendants-appellants.

2 William Kronberger, San Diego, Cal., for plaintiffs-appellees.

ORDER

3 Upon consideration of the decision of the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of County of Imperial, California, Petitioners v. Guillermo Gallego Munoz, --- U.S. ----, 101 S.Ct. 289, 66 L.Ed.2d 258, the judgment of the United States District Court for the Southern District of California and the judgment of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit, 604 F.2d 1174, are vacated and the cause is remanded to the United States District Court for further proceedings in accordance with the judgment of the Supreme Court of the United States.

Cites, in this corpus

Cited by