Gary L. Milligan v. W. T. Stone, Warden
Gary L. MILLIGAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. W. T. STONE, Warden, Respondent-Appellee
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Richard H. Chambers (author), Vincent A. Whelan, Alfred T. Goodwin
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
ORDER OF AFFIRMANCE
Generally, the order dismissing the petition for habeas corpus is affirmed on the basis of the contents thereof. The order is reported, Milligan v. Stone, 424 F.Supp. 1088 (S.D.Cal., entered January 13, 1976).
It should be noted, however, that the district court was under a misapprehension that a state certificate had not been sought for a state appeal. But the decision only alternatively relied upon this mistake.
Further, on the facts here one has to reach far to find a trace of a constitutional question.
Cites, in this corpus
- Milligan v. Stone Civ. 75-508-T · 1976-01-05