Finance and Constr. Co. v. Sacramento Drainage Dist.

California Supreme Court · Sac. No. 2346. Sac. No. 2347. Sac. No. 2348. Sac. No. 2349. Sac. No. 2350. · 1915-10-18 · Published · 152 P. 1197 · 171 Cal. 804 · 1915 Cal. LEXIS 675

Finance and Construction Company of California (A Corporation) v. Sacramento and San Joaquin Drainage District, W. W. Bassett v. Sacramento and San Joaquin Drainage District, Lizzie H. Glide v. Sacramento and San Joaquin Drainage District, Sparrow Smith and W. W. Bassett v. Sacramento and San Joaquin Drainage District, J. H. Glide and T. S. Glide v. Sacramento and San Joaquin Drainage District

Proceeding: appeal from orders
Trial court: Superior Court of Yolo County
Trial judge: W. A. Anderson
Outcome: other — The facts are similar to those stated in the opinion in Gallup v. Sacramento and San Joaquin Drainage District, ante, p. 71.
Area: civil
Panel: The Court (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

The questions presented on the above-entitled appeals are the same as those involved in Gallup et al. v. Sacramento and SanJoaquin Drainage District, Sac. No. 2351, decided September 21st, 1915, ante, p. 71, [151 P. 1142], and upon the authority of that case the orders appealed from are reversed.

*Page 1

Cites, in this corpus

Gallup v. Sacramento & San Joaquin Drainage District Sac. No. 2351. · 1915-09-21

Cited by

Meyer v. Reclamation District No. 17 Sac. No. 2193. Department One. · 1916-02-14