Cornic v. Stewart
J. W. Cornic v. Gertie E. Stewart
- Proceeding
- appeal from orders
- Trial court
- Superior Court of Los Angeles County
- Trial judge
- Grant Jackson
- Outcome
- dismissed — Appeal dismissed.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Richards (author), <italic>pro tem.</italic>
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
In this case no respondent's brief has been filed, but a cursory examination of the record discloses that the only appear before us is an attempted appeal from two orders of the trial court sustaining a demurrer to the plaintiff's first amended complaint and denying the plaintiff's application for leave to file a second amended complaint. Neither of these orders are appealable orders and there is no appeal from the judgment. It follows that the appeals must be dismissed, and it is so ordered.
Sloss, J., and Victor E. Shaw, J., pro tem., concurred.
*Page 243
Cited by
- Financial Corp. of America v. Wilburn H001010 · 1987-02-18
- Tu-Vu Drive-In Corp. v. Davies L. A. 29344 · 1967-04-24
- Tu-Vu Drive-In Corp. v. Davies L.A. 29344 · 1967-04-24
- Collins v. City & County of San Francisco Civ. 15135 · 1952-08-18
- Penland v. Golden Civ. No. 18357 · 1951-11-05
- Randall v. Beber Civ. 14537 · 1950-12-18
- Kline v. Beauchamp Civ. 11877 · 1938-11-21
- Rinaldo v. Superior Court Civ. 10752 · 1936-07-22
- Martinsen v. Ford Motor Co. Civ. No. 8562 · 1934-09-19
- Christensen v. Lucerne Holding Co. Docket No. 8782. · 1933-09-19
- Hurley v. Lake County Docket No. 4838. · 1933-07-08
- Hurley v. Lake County Docket No. 4838. · 1933-02-15
- Sturgeon v. City of Hawthorne Docket No. 4114. · 1930-06-11
- In Re Estate of Rawson Civ. No. 4682. · 1924-03-08