McArthur v. Mt. Shasta Power Corp.
RODERICK McARTHUR, Respondent, v. MT. SHASTA POWER CORPORATION (A Corporation), Appellant
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
This is a motion to dismiss an appeal from a judgment for the plaintiff in an action brought in the respondent court for an injunction and damages by reason *572 of an alleged wrongful diversion of water by the defendant. The motion is made on the ground that no record on appeal has been prepared, certified or filed in this court within the time prescribed by law. This matter was heard and submitted at the same time as the application for a writ of mandate to compel the trial judge to settle a bill of exceptions proposed by the appellant. The mandamus proceeding is entitled Mt. Shasta Power Corp.
v. Superior Court, (S. F. No. 14566)
post, p. 771 [12 Pac. (2d) 10], and the peremptory writ has this day been ordered. The time for filing the record on appeal herein will not commence to run until said bill of exceptions is settled by the trial judge. The motion to dismiss the appeal is therefore denied.
Cites, in this corpus
- Mt. Shasta Power Corp. v. Superior Court Docket No. S.F. 14565. · 1932-05-31