Estate of Turner
In the Matter of the Estate of Mary E. Turner
- Area
- probate
- Panel
- The Court (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
[1] The application for a writ of prohibition is denied upon the ground that such objections as petitioner has to urge to the confirmation of the sale referred to in the petition should be presented to the superior court at the time fixed by the clerk of said court for the hearing of the application for confirmation. We cannot properly anticipate the action of the superior court in regard to such objections. It may be further noted that in the event of adverse action by the trial court, petitioner's remedy is by appeal. (See Code Civ. Proc., sec. 1068.)
All the Justices concurred.
Cited by
- Estate of Callahan Civ. No. 7844 · 1965-11-01
- Finley v. Young Civ. No. 7844 · 1965-11-01