Heath v. Wilson
Henry W. Heath v. William F. Wilson, and Emma H. Conly
- Proceeding
- appeal from a judgment
- Trial court
- Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco
- Trial judge
- J. M. Seawell
- Outcome
- other — The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- Thomas B. McFarland (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
When this case was in Department, the foregoing opinion was prepared. After further consideration, we are satisfied with and adopt the same, and are of the opinion that for the reasons therein given the judgment of the lower court was right. It is therefore not necessary to consider the contention of counsel for respondent that the latter had acquired a perfect title by adverse possession.
The judgment appealed from is affirmed.
Shaw, J., Van Dyke, J., Lorigan, J., Henshaw, J., and Angellotti, J., concurred.
Rehearing denied.
Beatty, C.J., dissented from the order denying a rehearing.
*Page 370
Cited by
- Jensen v. Friedman Civ. 13334 · 1947-05-07
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Posted Civ. 12609 · 1944-05-27
- Metzler v. Foster Holding Co. Sac. 4952 · 1936-01-30
- Brainard v. Fitzgerald S. F. 15252 · 1935-04-16
- Ferguson v. Larson Civ. No. 8981 · 1934-06-07
- Foster v. Foster Docket Nos. 8263, 8264. · 1932-04-22
- Kaye v. Jacobs Docket No. 738. · 1932-04-08
- Johnston v. Whitehead Docket No. 7825. · 1931-06-17
- Hasenjeager v. Voth Docket No. 3434. · 1928-04-28
- Jarvis v. Webber Docket No. Sac. 3504. · 1925-04-27
- Unger v. San Francisco-Oakland Terminal Railways Civ. No. 4404. · 1923-02-26
- Commercial National Bank v. Roberts Civ. No. 3460. · 1920-11-10
- Parkinson Brothers Co. v. Figel Civ. No. 1214. · 1914-06-04
- Eidinger v. Sigwart Civ. No. 687. · 1910-06-23