Browning v. Reclamation District No. 108
J. W. BROWNING Et Al., Appellants, v. RECLAMATION DISTRICT No. 108, Respondent
- Proceeding
- appeal from a judgment
- Trial court
- Superior Court of Colusa County
- Trial judge
- George H. Thompson
- Outcome
- affirmed — Presiding. Affirmed.
- Area
- civil
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT
Upon the grounds stated, and for the reasons set forth in Hershey et al.
v. Reclamation District No. 108 et al., ante, p. 550 [254 Pac. 542], and in Browning v. Reclamation District No. 108, ante, p. 799 [254 Pac. 551], the judgment appealed from is affirmed.
Cites, in this corpus
- Browning v. Reclamation District No. 108 Docket No. Sac. 3867. · 1927-02-28
- Hershey v. Reclamation District No. 108 Docket No. Sac. 3866. · 1927-02-28