Indemnity Co. v. Industrial Acc. Comm.
Western Indemnity Company v. Industrial Accident Commission of the State of California
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- The Court (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
The hearsay testimony complained of relative to the statements of the deceased employee relating directly to his injury was competent under the provisions of section 77a of the Workmen's Compensation, Insurance and Safety Act, as amended in 1915, [Stats. 1915, p. 1102].
We are satisfied that such provisions cannot be held invalid as opposed to any provision of our constitution.
The application for a writ of review is denied.
Rehearing denied. *Page 316
Cited by
- Employers' Liability Assurance Corp. v. Industrial Accident Commission Docket No. 5891. · 1928-05-22
- Continental Casualty Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission Docket No. S.F. 11250. · 1925-02-27
- State Compensation Insurance Fund v. Industrial Accident Commission Docket No. S.F. 11209. · 1924-12-22
- McFeely v. Industrial Accident Commission Civ. No. 4502. · 1923-12-21
- Pacific Gas & Electric Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission S. F. No. 8910. S. F. No. 8918. · 1919-06-05
- Employers' L. A. Corp. v. Indus. Acc. Com. L. A. No. 5732. L. A. No. 5739. L. A. No. 5740. · 1918-12-24