Benvenuto v. Superior Court
Pastine Maddalena Benvenuto v. Superior Court of Santa Barbara County
- Proceeding
- writ
- Trial court
- Superior Court of Santa Barbara County
- Trial judge
- S. E. Crow
- Outcome
- other — thereof, from confirming a probate sale. Application denied. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- The Court (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
The application for a writ of prohibition is denied.
[1] We deem it proper to say that this denial is without reference to the merits of the legal question attempted to be presented by the application. Regardless of all other questions, we cannot assume to anticipate the action of the trial court on the application for confirmation of the attempted sale referred to in the petition.
It may further be suggested that we are not satisfied that in the event of unfavorable action on the part of the lower court the petitioner's remedy by appeal would not be a plain, speedy, and adequate remedy.
All the Justice concurred. *Page 294
Cited by
- Heinecke v. Superior Court Civ. No. 11862 · 1938-07-09