gno.law

North Confidence Min. Etc. Co. v. Fitch

California Supreme Court · Sac. No. 3561. · 1924-02-25 · Published · 223 P. 974 · 193 Cal. 336 · 1924 Cal. LEXIS 309

North Confidence Mining and Development Company (A Corporation) v. C. S. Fitch

Area
civil
Panel
The Court (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

The respondents moved to dismiss the appeal from the judgment taken by the appellants upon the ground that the notice of appeal was filed too late. This question turns upon whether or not there was a motion pending for a new trial. Appellants claim that the notice of intention to move for a new trial was not properly served and filed. Since the hearing of the motion affidavits have been filed showing that the notice of intention to move for a new trial was properly served by mail. The notice *Page 337 of appeal from the judgment was filed within due time after the disposition of the motion for a new trial and the motion to dismiss the appeal from the judgment is, therefore, denied.

Cited by