Pratt v. O'Neil
T. B. PRATT, Respondent, v. MARTIN W. O’NEIL, Appellant
- Proceeding
- appeal from a judgment
- Trial court
- Superior Court of Contra Costa County
- Trial judge
- William S. Wells
- Outcome
- affirmed — The judgment is affirmed.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- The Court (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
This is an appeal from a judgment in favor of the contestant in an election contest. It was determined by the superior court upon a recount of the ballots that the contestant had received one more vote than the contestee for the office of justice of the peace.
The rulings of the court upon objections to eight ballots are brought before us for review, the appellant presenting six exceptions and the respondent two.
Two exceptions by appellant were to the counting of torn ballots. There was no evidence to explain how or when the ballots were torn, and the trial judge counted them upon the assumption that they were torn after the voters delivered them to the election officers. The ruling, we think, was correct.
As to the other six ballots, all were correctly counted or rejected except two. One of these, in the opinion of a majority of the court, was improperly counted for appellant and the other improperly counted for respondent. A correction of these mistakes leaves the result the same—the contestant has one majority.
The judgment is affirmed.