gno.law

In Re Lapique

California Supreme Court · Crim. No. 2276. · 1919-11-14 · Published · 185 P. 178 · 181 Cal. 509 · 1919 Cal. LEXIS 384

In the Matter of John Lapique, on Habeas Corpus.

Area
other
Panel
The Court (author)

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

[1] Any question of insufficiency of evidence to warrant an indictment is not a proper subject of inquiry on habeas corpus (In re Kennedy, 144 Cal. 634, [103 Am. St. Rep. 117, 1 Ann. Cas. 840, 67 L. R. A. 406, 78 P. 34]).

In so far as appears, the sufficiency of the indictment in this matter cannot be examined into on habeas corpus (In reRuef, 150 Cal. 665, [89 P. 605]).

The application for a rehearing is denied.

Angellotti, C. J., Lawlor, J., Wilbur, J., and Olney, J., concurred.

Cites, in this corpus