In Re Murphy
In Re J.L. Murphy, on Habeas Corpus.
- Area
- other
- Panel
- The Court (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
The facts in this case are fully stated in an opinion of the district court of appeal for the second appellate district, filed in denying petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus. (See 8 Cal.App. 440, [97 P. 199].) Our investigations have satisfied us that such opinion correctly states the law applicable on the various claims made by petitioner against the validity of the municipal ordinance for a violation of which he is being prosecuted, and it is unnecessary for us to add thereto in disposing of this proceeding.
The writ of habeas corpus heretofore issued is discharged, and the petitioner remanded to the custody of the city marshal of South Pasadena. *Page 323
Cites, in this corpus
- Ex Parte Murphy Crim. No. 85. · 1908-06-26
Cited by
- Goytino v. McAleer Civ. No. 671. · 1909-05-27