Proud v. Southern Pacific Milling Company
C. J. Proud v. Southern Pacific Milling Company (A Corporation), the Patterson Ranch Company (A Corporation) v. Southern Pacific Milling Company (A Corporation), Aetna Insurance Company (A Corporation) v. Southern Pacific Milling Company (A Corporation)
- Proceeding
- appeal from judgments
- Trial court
- Superior Court of Ventura County
- Trial judge
- Merle J. Rogers
- Outcome
- affirmed — Affirmed.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- The Court (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
Although they are three separate and independent suits, the three above-mentioned cases are identical in their facts with the facts of the case of Runkle v. Southern Pacific MillingCo., ante, p. 714, [195 P. 398]. The points urged for a reversal in these cases by appellant, Southern Pacific Milling Company, are the same as those which were presented in said case of Runkle v. Southern Pacific Milling Co., and, therefore, what we have said in the latter case sufficiently disposes of the points made. Upon the authority of that case the judgments in these three cases are affirmed.
*Page 1