gno.law

O'Connell v. City and County of San Francisco

California Supreme Court · Docket No. S.F. 12282. · 1928-04-10 · Published · 284 P. 655 · 204 Cal. 1 · 1928 Cal. LEXIS 614

Daniel O'Connell v. City and County of San Francisco

Proceeding
appeal from a judgment
Trial court
Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco
Trial judge
J. J. Trabucco
Outcome
affirmed — Presiding. Affirmed.
Area
civil

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

THE COURT.

[1] Upon a careful examination of the record herein, we are satisfied that the plaintiff's complaint failed to state a cause of action; that the demurrer thereto was properly sustained, and that the judgment in favor of the defendants thereon was correctly given and made, and that this appeal is without merit.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cited by