gno.law

In Re Jacobsen

California Supreme Court · Docket No. L.A. 11951. · 1930-06-06 · Published · 289 P. 159 · 209 Cal. 539 · 1930 Cal. LEXIS 510

In the Matter of the Application of Victor L. Jacobsen for Reinstatement as an Attorney at Law.

Outcome
dismissed — APPLICATION for reinstatement of an attorney at law. Application dismissed. [L. A. No. 11951. In Bank. June 6, 1930.] In the Matter of the Application of VICTOR L. JACOB-SEN for Reinstatement as an Attorney at Law. Kemp, Partridge & Kemp for Petitioner. Charles L. Nichols for The State Bar.
Area
criminal

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

THE COURT.

This petitioner was admitted to practice law in this state by an order made and entered by the District Court of Appeal in and for the Second District on June 14, 1926. Subsequently he was convicted of a felony involving moral turpitude and placed on probation. This court thereafter, on October 18, 1927, made and entered an order that pending the termination of probation he be suspended as an attorney and counselor at law until the further order of the court. (202 Cal. 289 [260 Pac. 294].)

*540 He has now made an application that such order of suspension be revoked, and that he be reinstated as an attorney and counselor at law.

When the application came on to be heard in open court counsel for The State Bar directed the attention of the court to the fact that since the filing of the application for reinstatement the order admitting Jacobsen to practice law has been set aside and his license revoked by the court which admitted him to practice.

(In re Jacobsen, 105 Cal. App. 236 [287 Pac. 131].) The petitioner being no longer an attorney, his application presents only a moot question, and it is therefore dismissed.

Cites, in this corpus