County of Sierra v. Flanigan
County of Sierra v. P.L. Flanigan
- Proceeding
- appeal from a judgment
- Trial court
- Superior Court of Sierra County
- Trial judge
- Stanley A. Smith
- Outcome
- affirmed — The judgment is affirmed.
- Area
- civil
- Panel
- M. C. Sloss (author)
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
This case was argued and submitted with County of Plumas v.Wheeler, just decided, ante, p. 758, [87 P. 909], and involves the validity of an ordinance of Sierra County, substantially similar to the ordinance of Plumas *Page 770 County, considered in the Wheeler case. Here a general demurrer to the county's complaint setting forth the ordinance and seeking to recover license fees under it, was overruled, with leave to the defendant to answer. Upon his default for failure to answer within the time allowed, plaintiff had judgment according to the prayer of its complaint. Defendant appeals.
For the reasons stated in County of Plumas v. Wheeler, ante, p. 758, the complaint stated a cause of action, and the demurrer was properly overruled.
The judgment is affirmed.
Shaw, J., Angellotti, J., and Beatty, C.J., concurred.
Rehearing denied.
Cites, in this corpus
- Country of Plumas v. Wheeler Sac. No. 1361. · 1906-10-01
Cited by
- County of Mono v. Depauli Civ. No. 527. · 1909-01-27
- Wheeler v. County of Plumas Sac. No. 1341. · 1906-10-02