People v. Campridon
The PEOPLE, Etc., Respondent, v. ALBERT CAMPRIDON, Appellant
- Proceeding
- appeal from a judgment
- Trial court
- Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco and from an order denying a new trial
- Trial judge
- J. J. Trabucco
- Outcome
- reversed — Presiding. Reversed.
- Area
- criminal
Analysis
No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.
Opinion
THE COURT.
The appellant's petition for a hearing in this court after decision by the district court of appeal for the first appellate district, division one, was granted chiefly for the reason that one of the main questions presented upon this appeal was under submission be-fore this court in the case of People v. Scofiéld, 203 Cal. 703 [265 Pac. 914], The judgment and order in that case were reversed for the reason, among others, that prejudicial error was committed by the trial court in the giving of substantially the same instruction to the jury which is the subject of appellant’s criticism in the instant case. This being so, it follows that the judgment and order herein must be reversed upon the authority of People v. Scofield, supra, and for the reasons set forth therein. It is so ordered.
Cites, in this corpus
- People v. Scofield Docket No. Crim. 3056. · 1928-03-27
Cited by
- People v. Lowell Crim. 4060 · 1946-12-19
- People v. Dutra Crim. 574 · 1946-07-11