gno.law

Dempster v. Superior Ct. of City Cty of San Francisco

California Supreme Court · Docket No. S.F. 13282. · 1929-07-31 · Published · 279 P. 991 · 207 Cal. 795 · 1929 Cal. LEXIS 576

Louis R. Dempster, Etc. v. the Superior Court of the City and County of San Francisco

Proceeding
writ
Outcome
affirmed — Proceedings affirmed.
Area
civil

Analysis

No analysis yet. When one exists it is a model's reading of this opinion — the rulings it reviewed, whether it agrees with the court, and the authorities it checked — shown beside the court's own disposition, never in place of it. How analyses are made.

Opinion

THE COURT.

This matter comes to us upon a petition for a writ of review to determine the legality of the findings and judgment and other proceedings leading up to the formation of the proposed Golden Gate Bridge and Highway District, which matter has been determined by the defendant Superior Court contrary to the contentions of petitioner. [1] The questions raised have all been disposed *Page 796 of in a case from the county of Napa, California, involving precisely the same legal situation, which case has been this day decided by this court. (Wheatley v. Superior Court et al. [S.F. No. 13281 of the records of this court], ante, p. 722 [279 P. 989].)

For the reasons stated in the case last cited, the proceedings are affirmed.

Cites, in this corpus

Cited by